THE PORTRAYAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY IN SELECTED AFRICAN PROSE

ABSTRACT

Feminism(s) and masculinity(ies) are central concerns in gender studies, while queer studies, initially marginalised, is currently receiving greater attention in the West. But, in Africa, the queer, especially homosexuality, has received little creative and critical interest. This study would, therefore, fill the gap created by the dearth of literature on the subject. Homosexuality, the umbrella term for gay, lesbianism, bisexuality, transgender and other “sexual disorders”, denotes same-sex relationship, ranging from phatic communication to erotic communion and marriage. It is also considered a psycho pathological condition. This study investigated the portrayal of homosexuality in four purposively selected African prose: Jude Dibia’s Walking with Shadows; Wame Molefhe’s Go Tell the Sun: Achmat Dangor’s Bitter Fruit, and Tatamkhulu Afrika’s Bitter Eden, with a view to determining the portrayal of homosexuality, the reasons for positive or negative portrayal, the attitudes of homosexuals and heterosexuals to one another.

The methodology employed for the study was qualitative. This entailed a descriptive analysis of the chosen texts across the four regions of Africa: North, South and West.Three of the authors are males.Queer and Deconstruction literary theories guided the study. Queer theory was employed to determine the sexual status of the identified characters, aided character portrayal and representation and helped in the analysis of the prevalent attitude of Africans to homosexuals. Deconstruction provided alternative views of characters; destabilised the binary oppositions between male and female, men and women straight and gay and demonstrated the fluidity of gender.

The study revealed that homosexuals are stigmatised in the chosen texts. Gays are castigated as mere sissies and wrecks.In Walking with Shadows, Chika and Chinedu scold Adrian for beingso scared of plays common to boys. Furthermore, heterosexuals and homosexuals hate one another and homosexuals would combat homophobia by communicating their world-view, using irony. In Bitter Eden, Tony, a producer and homosexual, employs majorly active homosexuals as homosexual characters on stage. Moreover, few of the characters in the selected texts are portrayed as congenital (biological) homosexuals. In Go Tell the Sun, Kgomotso comes as a “biologically wired” lesbian, while Tom, Douglas, Danny and Tony are presented as circumstantial (cultivated) homosexuals in Bitter Eden. Tom becomes gay, following pressure and intimidation by Douglas. Kate is portrayed as a past time lesbian in Bitter Fruit. The study equally discovered that homosexuals could, at least, be pitied, and that the negative portrayal of homosexuals follows the African belief that homosexuality is unorthodox, forcing homosexuals to employ “escapism”. In Go Tell the Sun, Kgomotso commits suicide, while in Walking with Shadows, Adrian migrates to America.

The study concluded that despite the presence of homosexuality in Africa, it is still largely a closet phenomenon. Furthermore, the largely heterosexual African society still looks at same-sex relationship with indignation. However, it is the visibility of homosexuality that attracts homophobia. It is recommended that African writers should not glorify homosexuals in their works and that homosexuality should, at the least, remain in the closet. 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1              Background to the Study

Homosexuality denotes same-sex relationship or same-sex marriage. (Pollack, 1998: 207; Thompson, 1994: 357; Sarason and Sarason, 2002: 248; Aldrich, 2003:50; Allman, 2001:20) McMahon and McMahon (1982: 30) and (2011:245) state that homosexuality is that kind of sexual relationship between two members of the same sex. It involves a drive towards a member or members of the same sex.

But Nnachi (2011) sees homosexuality as a psychopathological condition. He argues:

The most basic definition of homosexuality is abnormal sexual attraction towards the members of the same sex. Thus, a homosexual may be considered a person with sexual desires directed wholly or in part towards members of the same sex. (p.245)

At the heart of homosexuality is desire and people are believed to be “wired” differently to nurse and pursue different desires. In the first place, it is suggested  that every literary text is in some way about desire and in the end one loves one’s desire and not or what is desired (Bennet and Royle, 2009:208).This corroborates the view earlier expressed by Pollack (1998:206) where he recounts an encounter with a young boy:

Being different, being gay…..I always knew I was different from the other guys, seventeen year old Bill explained to me. Whenever I went out to the movies with friends, most of the other guys were just dying for a cute girl to sit next to them. Nobody else seemed to realize it, but I was really hoping a good-looking guy would sit next to me. I don’t think anybody had any idea what I was going through.                                                                 (p.206)                                                                                    

Being homosexual, or gay, therefore, implies that a boy or girl, when he or she grows into adulthood, will primarily feel attracted, in a romantic sense, to other men or women. For instance, rather than falling in love with women and longing for a woman as a spouse, gay men fall in love with other men and hope to find a man with whom to share their adult lives. Again, just as heterosexual or straight boys do not ‘decide’ they are going to be heterosexual and as adults do not ‘choose’ a heterosexual lifestyle, homosexual boys do not ‘decide’ to be gay and, as adults, do not ‘choose’ to live a homosexual existence (Pollack, 1998: 207).This view is, however, problematic. This is because it seems to have foreclosed the option of choice open to humankind, of possibilities and even what people see as opportunities as life unfolds through growth. This view is supported by Thompson (1994:380) when he avers that homosexuality is a sexual orientation that goes arm in arm with sexual politics. Homosexuality is a form of rebellion. “It is the revolution nobody noticed”(Thompson,1994:380).Homosexuality is the dividing line between what societies presume to be “normal” (straight) and abnormal sexual behaviour. The subject is, today, assuming a very daring dimension. Pollack (1998:xxii) notes that “Boys today are in serious trouble, including many who seem “normal” and to be doing just fine. Confused by society’s mixed messages about what is expected of them… many feel a sadness and disconnection they cannot even name.”

Sarason and Sarason (2002) hold this view:

Homosexual behaviour is sexual behaviour with a member of one’s own sex. Homosexuals are individuals who prefer to engage in sexual activity with members of their own sex over an extended period. Female homosexuality is often called lesbianism… In recent years the term gay has been used by homosexuals to describe their life-style because they feel that the term has fewer negative implications than homosexual.  (p. 247)

Viewed alongside heterosexuality, homosexuality does not have a long history. According to Bennet and Royle (2009):

The first entry for homosexual in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) is from 1892. Critics such as Joseph Bristow have demonstrated that a critical appreciation of a play such as Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) is crucially dependent on an understanding of the historical emergence of a homosexual lifestyle at the end of the nineteenth century… While  the term homosexual can refer to both men and women, its entry into the English Language in the late nineteenth  century did not result in a sudden visibility for lesbians, however. (p. 209)    

                                               

This phenomenon started to generate both fear – homophobia – and interest, queering into a new subject or lifestyle that is a radical departure, not only from patriarchy, but also from heterosexuality which has been the norm over time. In deconstructing  heterosexuality, Sarason and Sarason (2002:248) remark sharply, “In the bad old days,…homosexuality was considered a mental illness.”Homosexuality, undoubtedly, started off in the closet. It, most probably, came into the open in Sodom. Consequently, the Bible reports that God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen. 19:1-25). According to the Bible, God forbids it, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination” (Lev. 18:22). It is a crime that attracts the death penalty:

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.(Lev. 20:13)

Moreover, a curse is placed on Sodomy /bestiality while culprits are to be put to death (Lev. 20:15; Deut. 27:21). Thousands of years later in the New Testament (of the Bible), homosexuality is seen as nothing but sexual aberration, with dire consequences (Rom. 1:27; I Tim. 1:10; Rev. 21:8).

            The word homosexuality first appeared in the English Dictionary in 1892 (Bennet and Royle, 2009: 208). Gay-related issues and activities are considered third wave feminism. Feminism itself has been traced to the publications of Mary Wollstonecraft (1792) and John Stuart Mills (1809), according to Sotunsa (2009:1). But the world had to wait until the 1960s for an open confrontation with homosexuality (Thompson, 1994:1). Thompson observes that the publication of The Advocate, a magazine published in the United States of America (1967/68), gave voice to gay interest and tips on a number of issues. Thompson says:

The tips, however, were for gay white men only; The Advocate wholly ignored people of color and almost never referred to lesbians, addressed their issues, or did anything to cultivate their participation. (p.1)

                       

Thompson’s  Long Road to Freedom (1994) is a compendium on homosexuality. Thompson himself is gay. Gay Pride Day was celebrated in New York City’s  Central  Park in 1970 (Thompson, 1994:33). Acting Up (the struggle for integration of homosexuals into the mainstream) was to follow in 1987. “Paradoxically, while 1987 was the year that gays and lesbians moved more heavily into the mainstream, it was also the year that heavy protest action against mainstream enterprises was launched (Thompson, 1994:307).Then came 1990, Year of the Queer (Thompson, 1994).  Thompson puts it this way:

If it aint on the six o’clock news, it aint news. In 1990,NBC, CBS and ABC couldn’t avoid us anymore. Week after week, we were six o’clock news… Twenty years, of gonzo gay activism had paid off handsomely in  the “year of the queer”, self proclaimed queers, disempowering the old slur by reclaiming it as an affirmation, upstaged the more traditional approaches to activism pioneered by national organizations and gay activities in the decades after Stonewall. With the assistance of seasoned media-savvy  activists like Larry Kramer and Muchelangelo Signorile, queer street fighters shrewdly positioned themselves to refocus the world’s televised view of homosexuality. (p.357)

Today, in America, most parts of Europe and other parts of the world, homosexual relations are legal. For example, May 17 is International Day against Homophobia (first celebrated on May 17, 2005 in more than forty countries) and “gay pride parades” are common in Europe and America (Kimmel and Messner, 2009:327).However, Africa is yet to come to terms with homosexuality. It appears that no one is openly comfortable with the subject. Thus, while the West is busy expanding the frontiers of same-sex relationships, Africa appears to be dissipating a lot of energy in the opposite direction (Thompson, 1994, xvii; Sarason and Sarason, 2002: 269; Nnachi, 2011:251 and This Day, Tuesday, 20 September 2016: 43).

With the exception of South Africa, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in Africa are very limited in comparison to many other areas of the world. Thirty-eight of 53 African nations criminalise homosexuality in some way. And some African leaders like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Yahyah Jammeh, former Gambian President, claim that homosexuality was brought to the continent from other parts of the world (Nnachi, 2011). Nnachi observes:

In Sudan, Southern Somalia, and Mauritania homosexuality is punishable by death. In Uganda, Tanzania and Sierra Leone, offenders can receive life imprisonment for homosexual acts. Egypt slams a jail term of up to 17 years on homosexuals. (p.252)

Moreover, in Nigeria, Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition ) Act 2013 is already in force. The Act reads in part:

1(i)       A marriage contract or civil union entered into between persons of same sex:

(a)        is prohibited in Nigeria.

2(2)      No certificate issued to persons of same sex in a marriage  or civil union shall be valid in Nigeria.

(3)        Only a marriage contracted between a man and a woman shall be recognized as valid in Nigeria.

4(i)       The registration of gay clubs, societies and organizations, their sustenance, processions and meetings is prohibited.

(2)        The public show of same sex amorous relationship directly or indirectly is prohibited.

5(2)      A person who registers, operates,  or participates in gay clubs, societies, or directly or indirectly makes public show of same sex amorous relationship in Nigeria commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of 10 years imprisonment.

Homosexuality has been seen as a queer specie world over, although the perception varies from place to place. This explains why it is dogged by fear – homophobia. Homophobia is the irrational fear and hatred of those who love and sexually desire those of same sex (Pharr, 1998:453). One who is homophobic may be called a homophobe. Lehne (2009: 325) defines homophobia as the “irrational fear or intolerance of homosexuality. Although both men and women can be homophobic, homophobia is most often associated with the fear of male homosexuality. This fear is a mixture of revulsion, apprehension, contempt, prejudice, aversion and antipathy, resulting in homosexual panic.

Citing online sources, Lehne (2009) says:

Homophobia is the fear or poor treatment of homosexuals. Coined by George Weinberg, a psychologist, in the 1960s, the term homophobia is a blend of the word homosexual and phobia from the Greek word phobos, meaning “fear” or “morbid fear”. The word “homophobia” is often used together with the word “transphobia” in documents explaining human rights violation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgander(people)-LGBT. (p.326)

In Africa where gay activities are muffled, literature remains a most veritable tool of probe. This is because the literature of a people is always revealing; it has been likened to a wonderland (Drake, 1971:v) The writer has also been described as the conscience of his society (Franco, 1970). Franco observes further:

The artist has a special responsibility towards society. The writer is increasingly considered as a man of conscience; his personal awareness makes him testify to the truth as he sees it, a truth which means facing his own and his national circumstance with unflinching honesty. (p.225)

The corollary is that literature mirrors society. Therefore, texts will be chosen across some selected regions of Africa – North, South and West – for the purpose of probing gay practice and lesbianism in Africa. The texts are:

1.      Walking with Shadows by Jude Dibia (2005);

2.      Go Tell the Sun by Wame Molefhe (2011);

3.      Bitter Eden by Tatamkhulu Afrika (2002) and

4.      Bitter Fruit by Achmat Dangor (2001).

1.2              Statement of the Problem

Over time, it has largely been assumed that human society has not only been designed to be patriarchal, but also heterosexual. Feminism is winning the war against patriarchy, but homosexuality is still being repelled with fury by individuals, groups and organisations. While the resistance is abating in the West, the opposite is the case in Africa. Due, perhaps, to phobia, not much has been done in this emerging field of study by African writers, literary scholars and critics.

Yet, Sharonrose (1998:467) argues that bisexuality is far from new. In the article, “Myths /Realities of Bisexuality” Sharonrose observes that bisexuality has been recognised and practiced since ancient times, but only recently has it emerged as a political identity in US sexual politics. Masculinity, feminism and, of late, homosexuality have been focal to gender studies. Even in Africa, masculinity and feminism have received remarkable attention. The result is seen in the volume of works on these subjects. But very scanty work has been done by African writers and critics on same sex matters.

Elliot, Mcfarland, Granite and Peckan (1970:1) argue further that all serious literature is concerned with universal themes – that is subjects which touch all normal men’s lives; spiritual not material; justice rather than food distribution; love rather than sex. Great themes touch our strongest emotions. In our time, literature (like architecture) has become more international. Homosexuality is fast benefitting from globalization, touching all men’s and women’s lives. It can no longer be ignored. The questions of identity and homosexuality have a good deal in common as they both constitute humanly important themes today, in politics and literature. This position is in consonance with that canvassed by Elliot, et al  (1970: XVI) when they posit that “There are a great many things to say about what literature is, but they must all include two essential points. It is a special way of talking, and it is about humanly important themes.”

The present study, therefore, attempted to fill some gap created by the dearth of literature on this form of prose which will also serve as spring-post for further enquiry by writers, researchers and critics. This is because homosexuality is fast becoming one of the great themes in world literature – themes such as the question of truth, the nature of justice, the meaning of greatness, fate and free will, love and hate, good and evil and the question of identity, among others.

1.3              Aim and Objectives of the Study

The main objective of this study was to investigate the portrayal of homosexuality in selected African prose. The specific objectives are to:

1.                  find out the ways in which homosexual characters are portrayed in the selected African novels;

2.                  determine reasons for negative or positive portrayal of homosexual characters;

3.                  find out the attitudes of heterosexual and homosexual characters to one another in the selected texts;

4.                  examine how the characters become homosexuals, that is, is it biological, cultivated or circumstantial and

5.                  investigate issues of homophobia in the selected texts.

1.4              Research Questions

This study addressed these questions, following closely the stated objectives.

1. How  are gay and lesbian characters portrayed in the chosen texts?
2. What are the reasons for the negative or positive portrayal of homosexual characters in the texts?
3. What are the attitudes of heterosexual and homosexual characters to one another in the selected texts?
4. How did the characters become homosexuals: biological, cultivated or through circumstances?
5. What are the causes and effects of homophobia in the selected texts?

1.5              Significance of the Study

Homosexuality is repeatedly in the news these days, although for the wrong reasons, most of the time. Homosexuals are either physically assaulted by heterosexuals or they incur the wrath of the law by sexually assaulting non-homosexuals. It is as though homosexuality was not practised at all in Africa. The study becomes essentially important as it carried out an in depth examination of the chosen texts so as to determine the practice of homosexual activities in Africa. A robust analysis of the selected texts has helped place homosexuality in its true perspective.

Besides, the study explored the African situation through engagement with the  selected texts and other secondary sources. Finally, there is a dearth of literature in Africa on homosexuality. This study has, therefore, enriched the existing literature on this queer subject. More importantly, writers, researchers, critics, students, archaeologists, anthropologists and clerics, among others, would find this emerging literary field both challenging and fascinating.

1.6              Scope of the Study

This study specifically addressed homosexuality in literature, that is, African literature, employing the selected texts. Homosexuality is a “loose” word that covers gay, lesbianism, bisexuality and transgender, among others, considered as queer subjects. It also examined the attendant fear – homophobia. The study focused on reality – what is – without speculating or moralising. Texts were drawn from three of the geographical regions of Africa. The regions were  taken to be representative of Africa, the cultural differences even within a region notwithstanding. The regions are North, South and West. The chosen texts are Jude Dibia’s Walking  with Shadows,Wame Molefhe’s Go Tell the Sun, Tatamkhulu Afrika’s Bitter Eden and Achmat Dangor’s Bitter Fruit.

1.7              Justification for the Study

This study is critical to the development of first-hand and essential information on homosexuality in Africa, in view of the general negative perception of homosexuals and the cultural issues involved in the discourse. This is through engagement with the chosen texts. It  provided sufficient groundswell for discussion and evaluation of homosexuality and other queer-related subjects in African texts and other sources. Much has been written on Feminism and Masculinity, but little attention has been paid to homosexuality, especially in Africa. As a matter of fact, this study is important because of its engagement with African texts where the issues of homosexuality are fore grounded.

1.8              Methodology

The research method employed for this study was qualitative. The study focused on practical textual criticism. This involved critical analysis of selected texts for the study. The approach embraced a detailed analysis and review of both primary and secondary materials. Four African novels were selected across the four regions of Africa. These texts were supported with other secondary materials. The primary texts are:

1.      Walking with Shadows by Jude Dibia (2005);

2.      Go Tell the Sun by Wame Molefhe (2011);

3.      Bitter Eden by Tatamkhulu Afrika (2002) and

4.      Bitter Fruit by Achmat Dangor (2001).

These texts were purposively  selected as the themes are congruous with the focus of the study. Besides, materials from secondary sources were consulted in the course of this research. Analysis of texts was descriptive. Moreover, the chosen texts were analysed, using Queer and Deconstruction theories.

1.8.1        Justification for Choice of Selected Texts

Drama, Poetry and Prose that treat diverse human subjects and interest flourish in Africa. But it appears homosexuality is visible enough in African Prose alone. Thus, prose genre was purposively chosen for this study. Besides, the selected texts sufficiently capture homosexuality, character portrayal and the concomitant fear of homosexuals by the largely heterosexual African society. The texts are detailed and pungent enough for robust critical analysis.

Above all, the authors are Africans sharing the African experience in this emerging field of study. All the texts are written in the new millennium, 2001 – 2011. This is because the subject of the study is relatively new in African literature. Older texts have dealt mainly with colonial issues, political, economic and social collapse. The texts are drawn from North, South and West Africa. Three of the authors are males, while one is a female.

1.9              Theoretical Framework

Two literacy theories were employed in the analysis of the selected texts in this study. The theories are Queer and Deconstruction. According to Goring, Hawthon and Mitchel (2001: 136) “A literary theory is a body of knowledge which contains the fruits of generations (even millennia) of engagement with certain recurrent problems which the reading and interpretation of literary works throw up.”

Kerlinger (1973), cited in Anaeto, Onabajo and Osifeso (2008:42) defines a theory as “a set of inter-related constructs, definitions and propositions that give a systematic view about phenomena.”Theories help students and critics to consciously make informed decisions that emerge from a set of assumptions which together constitute a theoretical position (Goring et al, 2001: 136).

Although many of the theories usually considered,  at least in their initial phases of development, had little or nothing to do with literature (Marxist, Psycoanalytic Theory, Queer Theory, for example), they have  a global scope (Goring et al, 2001: 135). Very few theories are, however, literature specific, for instance, the New Criticism – developed by literary critics and originally intended to be applied only to works of literature. A theory can either be descriptive or prescriptive. In other words, it may either attempt to describe how things are (how a literary work is read) or how they should be (this way of reading or interpreting rather than that). Queer and Deconstructionist Theories are basically descriptive.

1.9.1    Queer Theory

Queer, like Marxism and Feminism, started as a movement. Its goal was to secure political, legal and economic liberation for gay men and lesbians. It is these unusual sexual matters and every related subject that queer theory attempts to probe in literature and criticism. Queer began as a liberation movement from the 1960’s – 70’s seeking political, legal and economic rights equal to those enjoyed by the heterosexual majority. Queer is an involved word. This is how Benneth and Royle (2009) put it:

Queer’s a queer word. The entry of the word ‘queer’ into the English language is itself a study in the queer ways of words… Queer gained currency in the English language in the United States and elsewhere as (usually) a derogatory term for (usually male) homosexual. In the late 1980s and 1900s, however, partly in response to the spread of AIDS among gay men, the word took a queer turn: homosexuals themselves began to ‘reclaim’ the word. ‘Queer’ becomes a term of pride and celebratory of self-assertion, of difference affirmed and affirmative difference.

           (pp. 216, 217)

The word “manna” (see Exo. 16:15) is a question: what is this? This is because, at first sight, it looked absolutely strange to the Israelites. Like manna, queer literally implies that which is odd, strange, questionable, outlandish and unconventional, capable of eliciting an elastic set of questions. The “odd” (queer) is considered to be an opportunity to examine as well as re-examine social organisation and practices with the purpose of redefining how people see and understand themselves (Dobie, 2009:11). Dobie remarks further that “queer criticism takes as its subject matter all sexual topics that are considered unusual or odd – in other words – “queer” by implication” (Dobie, 2009:111). Imagine the scenario below.

Suppose two young boys, Abraham and Moses, living in the same neighbourhood, say Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, were to get married to each other. All was now set for the traditional wedding.  The clothes worn by both would-be husband and wife might be immaterial as either would most likely be a transvestite. While the huge gathering of both families, friends and other guests were busy exchanging pleasantries, before a great audience, the master of ceremony – Alaga Iduro – cheerfully announced, “Our sons (Abraham and Moses) are about getting married”. The audience would, probably, without rehearsal, chorus “Eemo, Eewo” – abomination! It is doubtful if a single person would wait behind for the next item on the agenda. That is queer.

A different  scenario is painted below. It is the report of a gay wedding ( Wall Street Journal, June 8, 1994, p.1, cited in Sarason and Sarason, 2002):

Erik Ladefoged and Kim Norgaard, surrounded by 30 family members and friends, finally were able to formally tie the knot in 1989 after living together for more than 20 years. We were married between two heterosexual couples. The couple found, to their surprise that the wedding was an emotional experience, symbolic not only as a public declaration of their love, but as their nation’s acceptance of them “I thought it would be a formality. But our friends were singing a traditional Danish song. I was happy all over. It was great to be gay and have the official handshake and smile of the state”

             (p.248)

“Mr Ladefoged”,  the report adds, “was a school teacher, aged 49”. Whether or not the society saw it as being different, the people would agree it was all right for them. More importantly, a place was found for them. But this not so in Africa. Surely, it is “a tale of two cities”

Queer theory was able to achieve the following in this study:

(i)     helped to determine the sexual status of the identified characters;

(ii)     aided character portrayal and representation; and

(iii) equally  helped in the analysis of prevalent attitude of Africans to the subject matter.

1.9.2    Deconstruction

Deconstruction is a radical theory, laden with revolution or rebellion. Deconstruction is a complex theory. It is an offshoot of post-structuralism, itself evolving from structuralism. “Deconstruction is generally taken to represent an important –even dominant – element in Post-Structuralism, and can be categorized as one of the progeny of structuralism only by remembering that children typically define themselves by quarreling with their  parents” (Goring et al, 2001: 171). To fix deconstruction appropriately, one must first seek to understand both structuralism and post structuralism, although post structuralism and deconstruction are sometimes used interchangeably.

On structuralism, Dobie (2009) posits:

Structuralism…seeks to understand how systems work. It accepts the belief that things cannot be understand individually. Instead, they have to be seen as part of a larger system to which they belong. In short, structuralists are looking, not for structure in a physical sense, but for patterns that unbundle human behavior, experience and reaction. (pp.153, 154)

Levi Strauss and Roland Barthes (both French scholars) propounded structuralism. Strauss started off by using linguistics as a model for analysing myth. Barthes went a step further by applying linguistics to the study of literature. Ferdinand de Saussure had earlier classified linguistics as Langue and Parole (Langue is the system or rules constituting language and Parole the actual use of language in communication).

It has traditionally been taken for granted that the structures reside in the physical world. Human beings found meaning in what they perceived   outside of themselves. But structuralists began to reason differently that structure comes from the human mind as it works to make sense of the world.

Structuralists, from Saussure, started to talk about signifier and the signified: written or spoken construction; then the meaning. Structuralists work mainly with prose narratives.

Post structuralism is a polished form of structuralism.  Structuralism cocoons the interpretation of texts; it makes the interpretation of texts static and rigid. But post structuralism argues that meaning is fluid, dynamic and constantly changing. Dobie (2009) notes:

The poststructuralists argued that texts are fluid, dynamic entities  that are given new life with repeated readings and through interactions with other texts, thereby producing  an ongoing  plurality of meanings. The poststructuralists point out that in a single text, one can find many meanings, all of them possible and all of them replaceable by others. (p.136)

Simply put, therefore, deconstructionists argue that texts are not meant to be dust-dry. They can be open to a plethora of meanings or interpretations. “Deconstruction provides a way of playing with language and meaning that teases and delights” (Dobie, 2009: 137).

Deconstruction Theory achieved the following in this study:

(i)     provided  alternative views of characters, issues and events in the selected texts;

(ii)   destabilized the binary oppositions between male and female, men and women, straight and gay, among others (Goring, Hawthon and Mitchell, 2001:196); and

(iii) the strategies of Deconstruction helped to demonstrate the fluidity of gender identity.

1.10     Operational Definition of Terms

The following terms, as used in this study, are defined below.

Homosexuality: This denotes same sex relationship or same sex marriage, hence homosexuals.

Gay: a male (boy or man) involved in sexual relationship with another male.

Lesbian: a female (girl or woman) who engages in sexual relationship with another female,

            hence lesbianism.

Bisexuality: romantic or sexual attraction or sexual behaviour toward both males and females. It

            connotes homosexuality.

Transvestite: a cross dresser, one who deliberately dresses in clothes originally designed for or

                        associated with the other sex.

Homophobia: irrational, unfounded or inexplicable fear and hatred of people involved in same-

                        sex relationship.

Institutionalised  homophobia: religious and state-sponsored homophobia

Internalised homophobia: fear or revulsion experienced by people who have same sex

                                    attractions, regardless of how they identify.

Sexual politics: all efforts geared towards securing all-embracing rights – political, legal,

                        economic, sexist, etc. – for women and homosexuals.

For more English & Literary Studies Projects click here

================================================================

Item Type: Project Material  |  Attribute: 83 pages  |  Chapters: 1-5

Format: MS Word  |  Price: N3,000  |  Delivery: Within 30Mins.

================================================================

DOWNLOAD THIS PROJECT MATERIAL NOW! CLICK HERE!

Share: