ABSTRACT
This study examined the impact
of fertilizer policy on crop production. The various trends in fertilizer
policy reform were explored. Specifically, the fertilizer policy was studied
under two policy regimes: the pre-liberalization and the liberalization
periods. The first period is between 1986 and 1996, which otherwise constituted
the pre-liberalization era while the years between 1997 and 2006 make up the
second period, otherwise called the liberalization era. Secondary data on the
distribution of fertilizer, usage-rate, fertilizer cost, yield of selected
cereals, as well as the time series features of the variables, test for
cointegration and the error correction mechanism were used in this research.
The descriptive analysis, students’ t-test and the regression model were used
to analyze the data. It was discovered that there was an increase in the
distribution of fertilizer in the second period. There was also an increase in
the yield of the selected cereals. Among the selected crops, rice had the
highest yield in the first era. The quantity of fertilizer distributed, the
usage-rate of fertilizer, the price and the policy periods of the variables
were found to have significant effect on agricultural production. The quantity
of fertilizer distributed and the price of fertilizer were found to have
positive effect on agricultural production. In order to increase agricultural
production in Nigeria through an effective fertilizer policy: the distribution
of fertilizer to farmers has to be timely. Farmers should be educated on the
dangers of excessive use of fertilizer in order to prevent environmental
pollution. Complementary use of inorganic and organic fertilizer should be encouraged
so as toensure eco-balance and food security.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
of the Study
Fertilizer
is one of the major farm inputs for achieving the green revolution objective in
the world. According to Dada (2006), during the Africa Fertilizer Summit, it is
generally believed that not less than 50% of incremental crop output in the
past five decades is attributable to fertilizer use.
Owing to
fertilizer use, along with other inputs such as seeds and agro chemicals, many
countries of the world with high population densities have been able to
achieve, relatively, food self-sufficiency in the past decades (World Bank,
2004).
Unfortunately, the benefits of
green revolution did not accrue significantly to sub-Saharan Africa to any
perceptible extent due, among other reasons, to inadequate use of fertilizer
(FGN, 2005).
The Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates of fertilizer need in Africa
concomitant to yield and area expansions for meeting the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) amount to an increase in total nutrients of 47% or 26% average
annual growth rate (UN, 2000).
This is why
members of New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) of the African Union
(AU) had formulated the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Plan
(CAADP) predicated on increased and efficient use of fertilizer. The components
of CAADP are consistent with the global objectives set in the MDGs as well as
the national objectives of Nigeria contained in the National Economic
Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) document (NEEDS, 2004). The
critical aspect of the MDGs in relation to the fertilizer sector is the goal to
reduce poverty by half by 2015, taking cognizance of the role of agriculture in
the economy wherein about 70% of the people are employed or engaged (Dada,
2006).
The role of
fertilizer is well established all over the world; crop output of countries
correlate strongly and positively with fertilizer consumption: World average =
91kg/ha; North America = 93kg/ha; Western Europe = 186kg/ha; South Asia =
96kg/ha; East Asia = 201kg/ha; All Asia = 141kg/ha; Africa = 19kg/ha; Nigeria =
Okolo (2004)
described the fertilizer supply in Nigeria as still inadequate. This accounts
to some extent for its low usage. One major impetus to fertilizer usage is an
improvement of the fertilizer market. Olomola (2005) stated that there is need
to improve the agribusiness market structure and performance.
Since the
establishment of a ministry for agriculture at the Federal level in 1967
followed by the creation of the first professional department (Federal Department
of Agriculture (FDA), in the ministry in 1970, the promotion of fertilizer and
other green revolution technologies has become a deliberate government policy
(Bello, 2006). The institutional policy on fertilizer involved the subsequent
establishment of the erstwhile Fertilizer Procurement and Distribution Division
(FPDD), which was established in the FDA in an effort to co-ordinate the
activities of the states in the importation of fertilizer (Dada, 2006).
For many
years, the FPDD served as the central agency for fertilizer importation and its
delivery to designated points in the country till the liberalization of the
sub-sector began in 1995 following which the division was re-designated as
Federal Fertilizer Department in 2001. During this period (1976-1995), the main
statute in force was the National Fertilizer Board Act of 1977 which provided
for the establishment of “a body corporate to be charged with the
responsibility for purchasing and distributing fertilizer to state government
at such subsidized prices as may be determined by the Federal Government” (FFD,
2006b).
Generally
“Fertilizer” means any substance containing one or more recognized plant
nutrient(s) that is used for its plant nutrient content and is designed for use
or claimed to have value in promoting plant growth (FFD, 2006a)
Specifically, “mineral
fertilizer” means fertilizer produced by mineral processes or mined and derived
from an organic substance or synthetic organic substance; while “organic
fertilizer” means fertilizer derived from non-synthetic organic material,
including sewage sludge, animal manures and plant residues produced through the.....
================================================================
Item Type: Postgraduate Material | Attribute: 49 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Price: N3,000 | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment