ABSTRACT
This study ascertains the
influence of merger and acquisition as a growth and survival strategy. The
crisis facing so many corporate firms as a result of capital inadequacy has led
to the collapsing of so many firms. As a result, it is the objectives of this
study to evaluate the impact of merger and acquisition on growth and survival
of corporate firms using banks as study, to ascertain whether the banks have
grown and survived as result of merger and acquisition. A survey research
method was applied. Data were collected through primary and secondary sources.
The population samples were drawn from two groups i.e. Access Bank and First
City Monument Bank. A judgmental sampling technique in which 45 and 50 of each
samples were selected was adopted for convenience sake. Data were analyzed
using “Z” test as an inferential statistics for testing of differences in
perception of participants on merger and acquisition as a means of growth and
survival and improving its earning per share. Ratios of the banks used for
study were employed for evaluation purposes. A regression analysis was adopted
to express the quantitative relationship among variables i.e. Return on Capital
Employed (ROCE) and Earning per Share (EPS), used in this study -the financial
ratios for pre-merger and post-merger. The result obtained after the analysis
showed that merger and acquisition act as a means for growth and survival and
improvement of earning per share of the banks. Based on this, the study
recommends that firms should re-train and re-educate its employees on the new
company’s culture so as to ensure a smooth transition and improved processes.
CHAPTER
ONE
1.1 Background of Study
Growth is
necessary to determine the performance and continuity of any business
organization. Without growth, a business can hardly survive and attract funds
from shareholders.
The use of merger
and acquisition as a growth and survival strategy in an economy like Nigeria
appears to be on the increase in recent times. This is not surprising,
considering the large number of business failures as result of adverse micro
and macro economic climate (Igweike, 2008).
In the face of
such hostile business climate, however, some business organization that belongs
to the ``wise group’’ started thinking of how to pull their resource together
by the way of merger and acquisition as a survival cum growth strategy.
Business merger
and acquisition has played an important role in the growth and survival of many
firms in Europe, USA, and Nigeria.
Firms are less likely to grow through mergers and acquisitions when stocks are
booming (Beckenstein, 1979).
Aggregate
financial market conditions do not impact on the nature of merger or
acquisition. The relation between GDP growth and growth of firms through
mergers and acquisitions is positive when firms seek immediate increases in production
capacity in a growing economy. The desire for firm to grow through a merger or
an acquisition might in turn be tempered by bad business conditions. In overall
the empirical evidence between GDP growth and growth of firms through mergers
and acquisitions is limited and mixed (Beckenstein, 1979). Industry variables
are operationalized by assessing concentration and sales growth in the
industry. According to Luypaert (2008), in highly concentrated industries,
firms tend to recognize the impact of their policies and actions on one
another. This could influence reactions to changes in competitive behavior like
quantity restrictions, tacit collusion and horizontal mergers and
acquisitions to increase the concentration within an industry which may help
firms to realize market power. Thus, a positive relation between industry
concentration and external growth may arise particularly in related mergers and
acquisitions. Conversely, when the industry is already highly concentrated, it
could have a lower incidence of mergers and acquisitions as there is less room
left for further consolidation. Also, antitrust authorities may closely
scrutinize newly planned deals when industries are already highly concentrated.
Large and profitable firms often have or can better access financial resources
that are needed to acquire other firms. Moreover large firms are expected to
engage more in diversifying mergers and acquisitions as there may be few
opportunities left for growth in their own industry ceteris paribus. These
financial resources can also create value when used to acquire a financially
constrained target firm thus a positive relation between profitability, firm
size and merger and acquisition (Gaughan, 2002).
1.2 Statement of Problem
In height of the
confusion and tumults of the modern business environment globally, some firms
have folded up while others only managed to keep afloat. It is but interesting
to observe that in the midst of such unfavorable business environment, some
enterprises do not merely survive but post super profit. The logical question
is what factors could account for the divergent fortunes of some firm of
identical size and status in the same industry and operating in the same
economy?
Merger and
acquisition has become one of the fashionable surviving strategy for many
companies.
It is therefore, the intention of the study to
investigate the effect of merger and acquisition on the performance of some
selected banks in Nigeria.....
================================================================
Item Type: Postgraduate Material | Attribute: 132 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Price: N3,000 | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment