CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
The Nigeria economy has been plagued
with several challenges
over
the years. Researchers have identified some of these challenges as; Gross
mismanagement/misappropriate of public funds (Okemini and Urata,2008).
Corruption and ineffective economic policies (Gbosi, 2007); jack of integration
of macroeconomic plans and the absence of harmonization and coordination of
fiscal policies (Onoh,2007); inappropriate and ineffective policies
(Anyanwu,2007). Imprudent public spending and weak sectoral linkages and other
socioeconomic maladies constitute the bane of rapid economic growth and
development (Amadi et al, 2006). It is evident that one of Nigeria ’s
greatest problems today is the inability to efficiently manage her enormous
human and material endowment.
Fiscal policy as a macroeconomic tool became
necessary in Nigeria
given the enlargement in the size and growth of the public sector. There has
been a tremendous growth in the public sector in Nigeria over the years. This can be
traced to several factors among which includes the need for reconstruction
after me civil war which was facilitated by the enhanced that accrued from the
oil boom of 1970s; the militarization of governance and the oil glut of 1980s.
Following the fall in the international price of oil in the 1980s, government
revenue dwindled and poverty revenue widespread and pervasive. It became
imperative that government intervention is needed to correct the perceived
imbalance resulting from the oil shock. In view of this, several fiscal
measures were introduced during this period including Structural Adjustment
Programme (SAP). The broad objective of
SAP was to totally restructure the productive base of the economy with particular references to
agricultural sector and import substitution industries with a view to
preserving the nation’s foreign exchange. This being the case however, the nation’s
economic problems remained intractable even with SAP.
The
problems were the continued depreciation
of naira in the foreign exchange market, stow growths, high at
volatile interest rates, and near
paralysis of the real sector, increasing fiscal deficits, inflation, increasing
unemployment and reduction me standard of living if most Nigeria The end result was that SAP failed to achieve its intended objectives and
was subsequently suspended in 1993.
In spite of many and frequently changing, fiscal,
monetary and other macro-economic policies, Nigeria has not been able to
harness her economic potentials for rapid economic development (Ogbole, 2010).
It is against this background that this researcher wants to systematically
investigate and empirically test the effect of fiscal policy on economic growth
in Nigeria.
1.1 Problem Statement
This study assesses the effect of fiscal policy on
economic growth in Nigeria .
The choice of this topic is induced by the poverty situation in the country.
The country has a great potential for economic advancement based on its vast
material and human resources. Yet, these are not utilized to advance the course
of welfare in the society. Fiscal policy is still widely organized as a potent
toot for enhancing growth, redistributing income and reducing poverty (though
the Nigeria
experience is tending to suggest otherwise).
These are the problem statement of the research:
1. What is the impact of public expenditure on
economic growth,
in
Nigeria ?
2. What is the
impact of government revenue on economic growth in nigeria ?
These are crucial questions to ask given the
renewed interest of the current democratic dispensation in achieving economic
growth and given the effort of the government to meet up with the millennium
development goals and vision 2010.
1.2 Objectives of the Study
The
broad objective of this study is to systematically examine the effect of fiscal
policy on economic growth in Nigeria .
The
specific objectives are
1.
To determine
the impact of public expenditure on economic
growth, in Nigeria .
2.
To determine the impact of government revenue
on economic growth in nigeria
1.3 Statement of Hypothesis
The working hypothesis of this study is to
investigate into the effect of fiscal policy on economic growth in Nigeria . The specific objectives are:
1. To determine the impact of public expenditure on
economic growth,
2. To determine the impact of government revenue on
poverty reducing.
1.4 Statement of Hypothesis
The working hypothesis of this study is to
investigate into the effect of fiscal policy on economic growth in Nigeria . To
this end, the hypothesis is stated thus:
H0: - government
public expenditure has no effect on economic growth in Nigeria .
H0: - government
revenue has no effect on economic growth in Nigeria.
1.5 significance of the Study
Policy is
a vital instrument in the macro-economic management country. As a result, the
stability or otherwise of any economy depends on the efficient management of
fiscal policy in the economy, In view of this, this research work is designed to serve the
interest of policy makers and government alike in policy formulation and
implementation. Researchers and students of economics will equally find the
work useful.
1.6 Scope and Limitation of The
Study
The primary focus of this study is on the Nigerian
economy. In conducting this research, GDP is used as proxy for economic growth
while government revenue (comprising oil revenue and non oil revenue),
government expenditure (comprising capital and recurrent expenditure), public
dept (comprising domestic and external debt)1 and public transfer are used as
fiscal policy variables. The study spans the period of 40 years covering from
1970 to 2010. Data is sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
statistical bulletin Vol.15 2007.
1.7 Definition Of Terms
1.7.1 Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy is the use of government spending
and taxation to influence the economy. Governments typically use fiscal policy
to promote strong and sustainable growth and reduce poverty. Fiscal policy also
involves the use of government spending, taxation and borrowing to influence
both the pattern of economic activity and also the level and growth of aggregate demand, output and
employment. Anyanwu (1999) defined
fiscal policy as that part of government policy concerning the raising of
revenue through taxation and other means and deciding on the level and pattern
of expenditure for the purpose of influencing economic activities or attaining
some desirable macroeconomic goals. Furthermore, he defined it as the policy of
the government with respect to the level of government expenditure (on
purchases of goods and services, and on transfers), the tax structure, and debt
operations. That is, government areas on three major macro-economic activities;
such as:
(a)
Spending on goods and services, and
transfer;
(b)
Taxing, and;
(c) Borrowing.
Jhingan (2OC’5 defined fiscal policy as government
actions affecting its receipts and expenditures which are ordinarily taken as
measured by the government’s net
receipts its surplus or deficit.
1.1.2
Economic Growth
Economic growth is defined as the increase
overtime of an economy’s capacity to produce. The amount of goods and services
needed to improve the wellbeing of the citizen in increasing numbers and
diversity. It is the steady process of by which the production capacity of the
economy is increased overtime to bring about rising levels of national
income (Todaro,1977). It is
conventionally measured as the percent rate of increase in real GDP. Growth is
usually calculated in real terms, i.e. Inflation adjusted terms, in order to
net out the effect of inflation on the price of the goods and services
produced. Thus, in discussing growth, it is imperative to examine the behavior
of the population overtime. This is because economic growth becomes a useful
concept if it leads to an improvement in well being of society overtime and
this can happen only if the rate of population lags behind that of economic
growth overtime. Thus, growth is a steady process of increasing the productive
capacity of the economy and hence of increasing national income being
characterized by ç; rates of increase of per capita output and total factor
productivity, labor productivity.
================================================================
Item Type: Project Material | Attribute: 51 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Price: N3,000 | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment