TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Table of Contents
Abstract
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Justification of the Study
1.5 Hypotheses of the Study
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Ecological Requirement of Maize (Zea mays L)
2.2 Socio-economic Characteristics of Farmer
2.3 Adoption of Technologies
2.4 Rate and Level of Adoption of Recommended Agricultural Practices
2.5 Effects of Recommended Practices on Farmers’ Standard of Living
2.6 Constraint Militating against Adoption of Recommended Agricultural Practices
2.7 Theoretical Framework
2.7.1 Social change Theory
2.7.2 Diffusion and Adoption of Innovation
2.7.3 Empirical Findings on Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations
2.7.4 Intensity of Adoption of Technology
2.7.5 Technology Adoption Lag
2.7.6 Impact Assessment Perspectives
2.7.7 The Concept of Impact Assessment
2.7.8 Empirical findings on Impact Assessment
2.8 With and Without Impact Methodology
2.9 Theoretical Model
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Study Area
3.2 Sample Procedure and Sample Size
3.3 Sources of Data Collection
3.4 Analytical Techniques
3.5 Operationalization and Measurement of Variables
3.5.1 Independent Variables and their Measurement
3.5.2 Dependent Variables
3.5.3 Effects
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Socio- Economic Characteristics of Adopters and Non-adopters of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
4.1.1 Age distribution
4.1.2 Educational status of the respondents
4.1.3 Marital status
4.1.4 Family size
4.1.5 Farm size
4.1.6 Extension contacts
4.1.7 Membership of social organizations
4.1.8 Use of labour
4.1.9 Cropping systems
4.1.10 Credit
4.1.11 Amount spent on Striga Resistant Maize Production
4.2 Level of Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Recommended Practices in the Study Area
4.3 Sources of Information on Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
4.4 Soil Management Adopted along with Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
4.5 Effects of Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
4.5.1 Effects of Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies on Adopters maize Output
4.5.2 Effects of Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies on Adopters income
4.5.3 Effects of Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies on Adopters Standard of living
4.6 Factors Influencing Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
4.7 Constraints to Adoption of Striga Resistant Maize Production Technologies
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Contributions to knowledge
5.4 Recommendations
5.5 Suggestions for Further Study
References
Appendix: Questionnaire
ABSTRACT
The broad objective of this study was to assess the effects of adoption of striga resistant maize production technologies on farmers’ livelihood in Kajuru Local Government Area of Kaduna State. The study was conducted in three communities namely: Kasua Magani, Dutsen Gaiya and Kufana. Primary data for the study were collected using well structured questionnaires administered to 120 adopters and 120 non- adopters of striga resistant maize production technologies farmers who were randomly selected; making a total of 240 respondents. The data collected were on improved striga resistant maize production technologies recommended practices such as, good land preparation, seed dressing, time of planting, seed rate, plant spacing, rate of inorganic fertilizer, organic manure and maize output, farm income and standard of living of the farmers. Descriptive statistics, Chow test and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results show that the level of adoption of technologies practices was high; fertilizer application was adopted most while weeding had the least adoption. Kaduna Development Project extension agents were reported as the major source of information on the technologies while the least information came through adopters’ friends. Age, marital status, extension contact, social organization and labour were positive and significant at 1% showing a direct influence on the adoption ofstriga resistant maize production technologies. Chow test analysis revealed that chow-F calculated was greater than F distribution indicating that the strigaresistant maize production technology had effects in the lives of the adopters in term of their maize outputs, income and standard of living. Lack of money was mentioned among many other myriad problems as a constraint in achieving maximum production.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Agriculture was the leading sector in the 1950’s and 1960’s. In terms of contribution to the economy, it accounted for 63% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), in 1960 – 1964, 54% of the GDP in 1965 – 1969 (Aigbokan, 2001). According to Balogun (2001) agriculture accounted for about 65% - 69% of the total exports and decline to about 40% in 1970. By 1996, agricultural export accounted for less than 2% of the export.
For more Agricultural Economics & Extension Projects click here
================================================================
Item Type: Project Material | Attribute: 111 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Price: N3,000 | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment